The latest online bitch&blab re: costumes and professionalism has got me thinking about Marketing. One of the many issues in the torrent is whether or not the self-styled "Rebels of Romance" (www.rebelsofromance.com) are branding themselves in a way that is beneficial to themselves or the genre. Lest I get hit by "defense spam", I'm not judging the authors in question or their approach to marketing. I'm cabbaging this example because it illustrates my point and because, as many of my non-feline readers are fellow authors, marketing is of some interest to us.
I don't want to market. I just want to write some books and get paid for it. I obviously employ, to varying effect, some of the methods an author can use to get her name out there, but I'd rather concentrate on writing and editing instead of selling myself and my fiction. I do acknowledge this may not be possible; hence this blog topic.
Marketing ourselves--the buzzword for which is branding--all starts when we let other industry people know we exist. We hop online, maybe put up a website or blog, participate in some groups, and send query letters to editors and agents, not necessarily in that order. We can be minimalist in the beginning, if we dare, but those query letters are where we really have to consider our image. Do we go for a plain, no-nonsense query and hope for the best, or do we start sculpting who are are as a writer, what our body of fiction currently is or will be, what readership we can expect or think we can capture?
I've read a lot of query-writing advice and I’m not going to hunt any of it down. You're just going to have to take my word for it this is what "people" say :). And they say, "Don't brag, dude." Don't say you (or your fic) is unique. Don't say you're fresh of voice, or wildly comic, or amazing, or better, or, I don't know, rebellious. Certainly never say you're the next So-n-So or you'll be bigger than So-n-So. Maybe your protagonists or plot have unusual characteristics, but branding yourself or your book with superlatives or certain descriptors is dangerous in the event you don't live up to them. Even if you do, it's a fine line.
When the book gets published (let's assume it does), we definitely need a website, if not a blog. We might be interviewed and go to booksignings and conferences and send letters to fans. What should this website have on it? What should it say about us, as writers--how should we brand ourselves? Will that brand work for whatever we take it into our heads to write in the future? How can we maintain that brand in our public "appearances", be they cyber or physical? If we don't have a specific brand, if we're generic or perfunctory, will we hinder our careers? Here's where the issue raised by the Rebels of Romance comes in for me. What can we, as authors, safely claim about OURSELVES and OUR FICTION AS A WHOLE when we attempt this branding stuff?
Can we dub ourselves rebels or our books cutting-edge? Even if we feel it's true and have review quotes to support it, can we claim our books, and by some extension our persons, are wonderful, unique, hilarious, insightful, and so on? Is this convincing to readers and potential readers or does it seem as if we're setting ourselves above other writers--other writers who are less wonderful, less unique, less hilarious, and less insightful? If we don't set ourselves apart, will our books be enough?
Can we brand ourselves without going there or is going there what branding ourselves MEANS?
Thoughts?
JW
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)







6 comments:
The problem with making ANY claim is that you immediately set up an "Oh, yeah?" response in many people's minds. If you SAY outright that you're cutting-edge or rebellious or whatever, you may be making it even tougher for yourself to prove it.
Reviews can do some of the heavy lifting for you, of course, but they have to be from credible sources. Unfortunately, most cover blurbs I've run across recently have been from a) the author's BFF, b) an author who writes for the same house, or c) someone who has the same agent. It doesn't invalidate the recommendation entirely for me, but I definitely don't give it as much weight.
I think what's happening a lot lately is that people are flat out panicking over the state of the market, so instead of letting their readership and buzz grow at a natural rate, they're using more and more extreme tactics to accelerate things.
I'm not against gimmicky promo. I think it can work, given the right audience. But where I absolutely draw the line is with anything that pushes one person forward at the expense of others. It's not only wrong, but STUPID.
I mean, can you imagine Pepsi coming up with an ad campaign that claims Coca-Cola tastes like dog whizz? Heh. It may have been tried in the past -- just about everything has, in the ad biz -- but the reason they don't use this approach is because it backfires.
I was just at Lynne's blog, and I wondered that you didn't say anything about the romance writer stereotype of the farm woman with the 50 cats. Although you only have 2, I'm sure Mean Kitty is worth 49 lesser cats. *g* And then I wondered why they would put the comment about the librarian. When you're a writer, it's not real smart to diss librarians.
I forgot to mention, I like the new look of your combined blog. :) I hope you'll let me know when your group blog is up.
I think being a farm woman who worked part time at a library would be a cool way to spend retirement. And I guess I could some up with some "forbidden" fantasies to write about. The big deal-breaker for me is the 50 cats, since I'm one of those clean-the-litter-box-every-day people. :-)
I would not like to live with 50 cats, not even on a farm, although a cat sanctuary has a certain appeal. I'd have to be hideously rich to afford all the vet bills!
Meankitty would not allow any cats besides Big D to come into the house, though.
I was watching your video with the eeevil white cat just the other night! If you wanted to have another 48 cats, they'd need their own house. :-)
Post a Comment